Nov
23

Life Insurance – Pros and Cons of Whole Life & Term Life Coverage

?Do I need life insurance?? ?Is whole life insurance a good investment?? ?Is term life insurance risky?? Questions like these are posted in online communities on a daily basis. The answers vary widely, with the term life and whole life camps polarized. The tone of the debate is surprisingly strident. After all, the topic is insurance?not a something expected to inspire strong opinions, let alone strong language. But words like ?rip-off,? ?scam,? and ?waste of money? fly back and forth, sometimes accompanied by rows of exclamation marks or worse. What is behind the brouhaha? And which camp?if either?is right?The two sides do not even agree about whether a person needs life insurance. Whole lifers say, yes. You do not want the death of a family member to disrupt your family?s finances or jeopardize its future. It is hard enough to ad employment law advice for employers just to the loss of a loved one. Adding financial difficulties exacerbates the problem. With the skyrocketing costs of funerals, even children and seniors should have at least a small life insurance policy. Not so fast, say the term lifers. The only reason to have life insurance is to replace the lost income of a family member who dies, and then only when the spouse or family is dependent on that income. If you are single with no dependents and no debts that might be transferred to your family in the event you die, then you do not need life insurance. If you are married and your spouse works, you probably do not need life insurance, either, assuming your spouse makes enough to support himself or herself. The time for life insurance, term lifers say, is when the policyholder?s income is vital to the financial security of the family.

Comments are closed.